The New York Times on X: The period underwear brand Thinx made public that it reached a settlement in a class action lawsuit claiming its products contain harmful chemicals, known as PFAS
By A Mystery Man Writer
The New York Times on X: The period underwear brand Thinx made public that it reached a settlement in a class action lawsuit claiming its products contain harmful chemicals, known as PFAS
Australian period underwear makers deny using 'forever chemicals' after Thinx settles suit in US, PFAS
What to know about PFAS after Thinx underwear settles class-action lawsuit - Good Morning America
Thinx settles lawsuit over period underwear marketing: What to know - The Washington Post
Toxic chemicals in period underwear? What to know as U.S.-based Thinx settles lawsuit - National
Thinx lawsuit: What to know about the settlement and PFAS exposure : NPR
Thinx lawsuit: What to know about the settlement and PFAS exposure : NPR
Thinx settles lawsuit over period underwear marketing: What to know - The Washington Post
What the Thinx Class Action Settlement Means for All of Us
Thinx settles lawsuit over period underwear marketing: What to know - The Washington Post
Thinx lawsuit: What to know about the settlement and PFAS exposure : NPR
Thinx Reaches Settlement in 'Forever Chemicals' Period Underwear Class Action Lawsuit - Fashionista